Money

Milo Yiannopoulos has a LOT of “Super Fans” but no one else Grabs Life by the Grapefruit and Squeezes quite as good as Michah: one such fan.
On a recent dare, Milo informed Michah he would let him regain his Admin rights (if he completed a dare) back to Milo’s “Fag Chat” the room that up until now has been a pay only chat room, with changing names.
For example, Milo has mocked a church, mocked Antifa, mocked a school, and currently, Milo sits as “Judge Milo” the current link at the time of this article is: https://t.me/joinchat/LHoLt1A8PXVPq2ml9_qNyA remember in his court it is NOT a Democracy.
Recently Milo has complained a lot about the lack of book sales, etc, etc and the worries of putting food on the table for him and his wonderful husband as pictured below (not really)
I will be honest I myself have been caught up in the drama of the world of Milo, I even paid $13 to be “unsilenced,” yes Milo has found a way to make money off this chat, fees levied on those that disobey. Yes, Milo will “silence” you, the same Milo, who is the master of being banned from everything which I find kind of ironic to be “silenced” by one that complains how everyone silences him. If I might add Milo has even set up a system where people can pay to have others banned and then reinstated, and that is not even all! Just ask anyone in chat about the “rules” especially #ShariaTuesdays where women are NOT allowed to talk. It can be frustrating for some, but in Milo’s Kingdom, he likes to keep it fresh.
I have even allowed myself to get very emotional about his rejection of my work, and my silencing. So, I have put that energy into a weekly show covering some of the highs and very very very lows of Milo’s chat.
This week started out normal as there was a Mock Funeral for Michah, but within 12 hours Michah was made whole again in at least zombie form… which led towards an even fruitier and more citrus path for dear Michah the budding fruitiphile. (I am sure there is a much better not made up name)
For you see in 2020 the land of complaining about Gays and Drag queens (just ask Lady Maga) being allowed in the “Conservative” movement because they are something other than “traditional conservative” is a LARGE issue for many in the “conservative” movement. This is something I personally believe that is holding back the Republicans and our #GaysForTrump movement, in general, the embracing of diversity in the party which may just include getting OK with embracing identity politics. If only to prove to others that they too do not have to be trapped on the left and can #GoRight breaking the “Traditional mold” and ensuring future victories for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Though we have to warn you that there is such a thing as extremism that we do have to worry about… my question, does Sex With Fruit belong in Conservative America?
Who knows, I know this for sure.. people might call me fruit but I sure as hell am not having sex with one!
To each his own Michah for I hope you do get that piece of American Pie!
Also, Remember, Milo is NOT OK! All Right?!
Below is this week’s episode of Milo is Not OK! All Right?!
Milo Is Not OK! All Right?! Episode 1
Fighting the Culture War One Grapefruit at a Time
Michah Screws a Grapefruit!
I told you Milo was NOT All Right…
Warning Contents are UNCENSORED
Strong Language and some weird situations… not for all ages
#MiloIsNotOk #MiloIsNotAllRight #CultureWar
Fighting the Culture War One Grapefruit at a Time – Milo Is Not OK (All Right) Episode 1
The Opinions Expressed in These News Stories, do not always represent the views of the Full Staff, and the Movements and Charities We Endorse.
We Fully Believe that Together All Parties and People Can Make America (and the World) Great Always (For Everyone)
Follow @PeterBoykin on
TeleGram: T.ME/RealPeterBoykin
Facebook: Facebook.com/PeterRobertBoykin
YouTube: YouTube.com/c/PeterBoykin
Instagram: instagram.com/peterboykin/
Reddit: reddit.com/user/peterboykin
Visit Our Network of News Pages:
Join #TheMagaNetwork
Support These Great Charities and Movements
GoRight.US #GoRight
Related


Tomi Lahren had something to say about Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg after he expressed support for Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders’ controversial statement that
“there should be no billionaires.”
Zuckerberg recently was asked to comment on Sanders’ declaration that billionaires should not exist, Zuckerberg – the fifth richest person in the world – offered his unexpected take.
“I understand where he’s coming from, I don’t know if I have an exact threshold on what amount of money someone should have but on some level, no one deserves to have that much money.”
Tomi followed up with a statement of her own on Fox Nation
“Well, Mark, that’s easy for you to say, since you are worth an estimated billion dollars and since – despite the best efforts of people like Bernie Sanders – we are not yet a socialist nation and you know that money won’t be confiscated from you”
“I am sick of these liberals telling us what we deserve and don’t deserve,” she concluded.
“This is America, we deserve what we work hard to earn … butt out.”
Lahren then doubled down on her praise of the current capitalist structure in the U.S. and warned against the redistribution of wealth.
“Whether Zuck wants to admit it or not, he knows taxation, confiscation and over-regulation kill innovation. He also believes he knows how to spend his money better than the almighty government. He lives his life like a compassionate capitalist and still feels like he must bow down to wannabe socialists like Bernie Sanders. Ridiculous,”
“Think Facebook could have been founded in Cuba or Venezuela? Think again,”
“Looks like slamming capitalism, while benefiting from capitalism, is quite lucrative … I’m sure it is easy for you to sit in one of your 10 properties and ponder whether you deserve it…while basking in it all,”
“That’s fantastic, but in a way, this only makes my point. Zuckerberg was able to achieve and attain his billions by working hard – harder than most – taking chances, building a company and a mega-brand via innovation and capitalist principles,”
Lahren also discussed Zuckerberg’s plan to donate 99 percent of his Facebook shares to charity, specifically the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative – which uses technology to solve challenges like eradicating disease and reforming the criminal justice system – but noted that his decision to do so represented the very premise on which capitalism was founded on.
“Zuck chooses to donate huge sums of his money the way he sees fit — not by government dictate or mandate. Would he prefer to pledge that estimated billion in Facebook stock to the U.S. government? Send it to the swamp so the bureaucrats could divvy it up the way they see fit? I don’t think so,”
Related

The #Libra Association has announced it’s planned for a simple global currency and financial infrastructure.
Find out more https://libra.org/en-US/
The #Libra Association is today announcing plans for a simple global currency and financial infrastructure. Find out more https://t.co/VPS7LllcNn #blockchain #cryptocurrency pic.twitter.com/mdHymhsrcH
— Libra (@Libra_) June 18, 2019
The Libra Association was initially composed of a handful of large firms, but PayPal Holdings has since severed ties with the project.
Though it seems that even though PayPal may have stepped out of the picture, Facebook is now taking that place. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is set to testify before the House Financial Services Committee over the platform’s plans to implement its own digital currency. Sources close to the matter this week said Zuckerberg will be the only witness at the hearing later this month.
Though online currency makes people feel uneasy pure and simple is due to the unpredictability and the wild market cycles of similar currencies like Bitcoin. This makes Global regulators wary of how digital currency will impact the financial system. The Libra currency was created to boost e-commerce and advertisements within Facebook with plans to release the cryptocurrency in 2020, but a number of factors may halt the company’s progress. The real concern is that Facebook has data on billions of people and has repeatedly shown a disregard for the protection and careful use of this data it is also agreed that Congress and regulators have the opportunity to examine the consequences of what happens if Facebook creates such a currency.
Moving money around globally should be as easy, cost-effective and even more secure than sending a text message or sharing a photo — no matter where you live, what you do, or how much you earn. https://t.co/Eea4vMKYlv #Libra #FinancialInclusion #blockchain #cryptocurrency pic.twitter.com/WXw9Rypxmj
— Libra (@Libra_) June 20, 2019
What do you think?
Help Support Peter Boykin and Maga First News:
Join SubscribeStar at https://www.subscribestar.com/peterboykin
Join Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/peterboykin
or One Time Donation at https://www.paypal.me/magafirstnews
Follow – Peter Boykin
at Telegram – https://www.T.Me/PeterBoykin
at Facebook – https://www.Facebook.com/PeterRobertBoykin
at YouTube – https://www.YouTube.com/PeterBoykin
at Reddit https://www.reddit.com/user/peterboykin/
at Instagram https://www.instagram.com/peterboykin
Purchase Peter Boykin’s Book #RussiaGate: Truth, Post-Truth, or Damned Lies?!
on Amazon.com at https://www.amazon.com/RUSSIAGATE-TRUTH-POST-TRUTH-DAMNED-LIES-ebook/dp/B07XKW767S/
Websites:
Related
President Trump will be suing ex-White House aide Omarosa Manigault Newman.
In a tweet Saturday, the president said he’s currently suing “various people” for confidentiality agreement violations. Including Omarosa, Trump said he gave her a career break, but she went for some cheap money with a book… #Sad Newman published a book about her alleged experiences working with the president last year.
This tweet comes after Trump said he wouldn’t have to enforce a confidentiality agreement he had with his former personal assistant Madeline Westerhout, who stepped down earlier this week.
…Yes, I am currently suing various people for violating their confidentiality agreements. Disgusting and foul mouthed Omarosa is one. I gave her every break, despite the fact that she was despised by everyone, and she went for some cheap money from a book. Numerous others also!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 31, 2019
Related
New Border wall in ‘smuggler’s gulch’ is working according to CBP agents
Justin De La Torre stated a steep, open canyon between San Diego and Tijuana has been used for decades by immigrants to smuggle drugs into the U.S. from Mexico.
“It has an anti-climb feature, it’s made of steel, it also has a concrete base that prevents digging from underneath, and now we’re able to control this area with the new infrastructure.”
According to California Border Patrol agents, new infrastructure in an area known as “smuggler’s gulch” is making a difference.
President Trump moved to replace the fencing along the San Diego border earlier this year as his administration sped up moves to build taller, stronger border reinforcement.
“This is a smart, strategic, see-through steel barrier — not just a simple concrete wall,”
said the president.
“It will be deployed in the areas identified by border agents as having the greatest need, and as these agents will tell you, where walls go up, illegal crossings go way down.”
Numerous wall construction projects are underway across the Southwest border, including projects in California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. — CBP (@CBP) August 25, 2019
Related

Array
AUDIOBOOKS FOR PATRIOTS DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL – NARRATED BY ALEXANDER SANGMOORE
1. EASY MEAT; MULTICULTURALISM, ISLAM AND CHILD SEX SLAVERY
2. UN GLOBAL COMPACT ON MIGRATION
3. PRACTICAL IDEALISM – KALERGI AND HIS PLANS FOR EUROPE IN HIS OWN WORDS
4. SUN TZU – A TREATISE ON THE ART OF WAR
5. THE PRINCE, BY NICCOLLO MACHIAVELLI
6. THE ART OF BEING RIGHT OR 38 STRATEGEMS TO WIN AN ARGUMENT, BY ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER
7. THE SEVEN DA VINCIAN PRINCIPLES
8. 10 UNIVERSAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CULTS
Why you should buy them
1. Money spent educating oneself and Ones Family is NEVER wasted
2. Help me continue producing audiibooks
3. Highest quality professional audio recordings
4. Many of the audiobooks are Exclusive World First narrations [See audiobooks 1, 2, 3]
5. I’m povertous and need a Passport
To purchase go to the following group and state which of the above you’d like to get.
You will be DM’d with the audiobook itself and after you have it a link to payment options
Telegram: @audionook
ALTERNATIVELY TO PURCHASE EASY MEAT IMMEDIATELY ON AMAZON USE THE FOLLOWING LINKS
UK USERS AUDIOBOOK BOUNTY URL: https://www.audible.co.uk/pd/B07QYPF4SZ/?source_code=AUKFrDlWS02231890H7-BK-ACX0-148766&ref=acx_bty_BK_ACX0_148766_pd_uk
US USERS AUDIOBOOK URL BOUNTY
AUDIOBOOK: EASY MEAT, MULTICULTURALISM, ISLAM AND CHILD SEX SLAVERY – NARRATED BY ALEXANDER SANGMOORE – THIS BOOK’S CONTENTS ARE WHY TR IS IN PRISON – BUY IT AND GIVE IT FREELY TO WOMEN – SISTERS, MOTHERS, DAUGHTERS, AUNTS, ANY WOMEN YOU CARE ABOUT – INSIST THEY LISTEN TO THIS V E R Y IMPORTANT AUDIOBOOK
Read / Listen to it and send it to your wives girlfriends mothers sisters and daughters and INSIST THEY LISTEN TO CHAPTERS 7.6 AND 7.7
@everyone
Array
Related

Even though it will add significantly to the national debt, President Donald Trump would prefer that the Senate pass the current budget deal and has acknowledged he will sign the legislation
“When the Democrats won the House, everybody knew we were going to end up spending more money,”
According to acting White House chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney added that the agreement is still a victory for the Trump administration.
“The Democrats wanted to limit our policies on the border, they wanted to limit our policies regarding pro-life, they wanted to limit our policies regarding deregulation — and we won on every single one of those,”
“So, did we spend more money than we wanted to? Yes. Did we get a lot in return. Yes.”
When asked about Trump’s promises as a presidential candidate to quickly balance the budget, Mulvaney quickly deflected all blame for the deficit towards the Democrats.
Like Our Content?
Related

Billionaire Tom Steyer, a former hedge fund manager, wants to “break the corrupt stranglehold that corporations have on our government” and take on President Donald Trump in 2020.
Steyer’s comments came during a Thursday interview on “CBS This Morning.” Steyer announced his candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination on Tuesday.
“To me the biggest question facing the United States is not what we should do, but how are we going to break the corrupt stranglehold that corporations have on our government,” Steyer said.
He added: “For the last 10 years, I’ve been trying to push power back to the people of the United States.
Steyer, who will reportedly spend $100 million of his own funds on his campaign, said his candidacy is “not about the money.” He maintained it is aimed at “trying to retake the government.”
“This is about retaking the democracy from the corrupt corporate power that is determining what happens in Washington, D.C.”
Meanwhile, Steyer’s campaign to impeach Trump will continue under new leadership during his presidential bid.
Related

The Supreme Court is gearing up to decide next term whether states can ban students from using student-aid programs to attend religious institutions – an education dispute that could have major ramifications for the school choice movement.
The justices announced at the end of last month’s session that they will take up the case of Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue — which concerns whether states can ban student-aid programs that allow families to choose religious schools for their children. In December 2018, the Montana Supreme Court struck down a tax-credit scholarship program in the state, saying the program violated the state constitution’s “No-Aid clause” barring government money for religious schools because it had allowed students to use the money for that purpose.
“Every parent should have the right to choose where they send their kids to school,” Kendra Espinoza, one of the plaintiffs challenging the Montana decision, told Fox News.
Kendra Espinoza and her daughters. Espinoza is a plaintiff in a school choice case that’s made its way to the Supreme Court. (Institute for Justice)
Others see the case as an assault on the separation of church and state.
“The decision by the court to review the Montana case signals that the majority may be gunning for the strong provisions in most state constitutions that bar public school funds from going to religion or religious schools,” the Freedom from Religion Foundation, a liberal advocacy group, said in a June 28 statement.
Government money going to religious schools doesn’t necessarily violate the First Amendment, but appeals courts are split on whether excluding such schools from programs like Montana’s violates religious freedom.
The legal staff of the Freedom from Religion Foundation, which says it plans to file an amicus curiae brief with the Supreme Court supporting the Montana decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Patrick Elliott, who spoke with Fox News, sits in the bottom row, second from the right. (FFRF)
TED CRUZ: CITIZENSHIP QUESTION ON CENSUS IS ‘BASIC COMMON SENSE’
The tax-credit scholarship program, passed in May 2015, gave Montanans up to a $150 credit for donating to private scholarship organizations, which helped students pay for their choice of private schools.
It’s similar to many programs across the U.S., and other states have proposed tax-credit scholarship programs but not passed them due to confusion about their legality.
FFRF attorney Patrick Elliott says the Supreme Court should leave decisions on these programs to state courts.
“I think this case involves interference with state rights,” he told Fox News. “States can adopt constitutional protections without federal interference.”
Espinoza said she enrolled her daughters in a private Christian school because she wanted a values-based education that would challenge them academically, but she has trouble paying for tuition and relies on scholarships. She planned to use Montana’s tax-credit scholarship program.
“I’ve been working two and three jobs just to make ends meet,” she said. “There was a question of whether I could afford it.”
TEXAS LAWYERS ARGUE FOR END OF OBAMACARE IN CASE THAT COULD DECIDE FATE OF HEALTH PLAN
But the Montana Department of Revenue said providing tax credits for donations that later help pay tuition at private schools amounts to indirect funding of religious education by the state, in violation of the “No-Aid clause” – also known as a Blaine Amendment. It made a rule preventing Espinoza or other religious school families from receiving the scholarships.
Espinoza and the libertarian Institute for Justice sued the department over that rule in December 2015, but the Montana Supreme Court invalidated the entire program last year. Espinoza’s lawyers say the program was voided simply because it afforded a religious option, and the U.S. Supreme Court should restore what the Montana legislature passed.
“The federal Constitution prohibits that kind of animus toward religion and the fact that animus is codified in the Montana Constitution in the Blaine Amendment only makes things that much worse,” Institute for Justice senior attorney Michael Bindas said.
Blaine Amendments originated in the 1870s when, as Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a 2000 case, “it was an open secret that ‘sectarian’ was code for ‘Catholic.’” Thirty-seven states have Blaine Amendments today, but Bindas calls them, “vestiges of 19th century anti-Catholic bigotry.”
Espinoza’s lawyers also cite Trinity Lutheran, a Supreme Court case from 2017 that ruled Missouri couldn’t deny a church a grant to resurface its playground simply because it was a church.
But Elliott said Blaine Amendments don’t mention a specific religion and have operated without bias.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“No funding of religious education was something states decided early on because they didn’t want to have a religiously segregated school system,” he said. “Public schools are open regardless of religious background. That’s not always the case with private schools.”
If the justices reverse Montana’s decision, it could open the door to more scholarship and voucher programs across the U.S.
“This case has the potential to remove Blaine Amendments as a barrier to school choice throughout the country,” Bindas said.
Related