Ellen Dared to sit next to former President George W. Bush while watching a Dallas Cowboys football game of course the critics on the internet decided it was a great reason to be up in arms, to complain that Ellen and “W” were having fun and smiling, Somehow, the sight of two people who share different political values yet chose to spend time together was a reason for online outrage.
Honestly, what is wrong with getting back to debating with others instead of tearing down each other? Just because someone else might disagree with you on some ideas and stances does not make the other person a demon. This is what the political scene needs to understand. America could be greater if we all had this in mind.
DeGeneres responded to the social media outrage on Twitter and reminded people that if you don’t share someone’s ideas it doesn’t mean you can’t consider them a friend.
“Here’s the thing: I’m friends with George Bush. In fact, I’m friends with a lot of people who don’t share the same beliefs that I have.”
“Mr. Rogers extolled the virtues of being an individual and caring about others, offering everyone, regardless of their background and based on their humanity, an invitation to be his neighbor.”
Let’s just hope that this will be one of many moments in the future where this message of kindness is repeated!
#RUSSIAGATE: TRUTH, POST-TRUTH OR DAMNED LIES?
Everybody hates fake news, right?
Then again, one man’s fake news is another man’s infallible truth.
So how to discern truth from falsehood, in the foaming churning sea of ‘narratives’ and ‘counter-narratives?’
Ever since the nihilistic professors of chaos undermined public discourse and the very foundations of language, by the ‘revolution’ of postmodernist nihilism, where everybody has a right to their own opinions and reality is whatever you make of it, the risk that facts, truth, and history would be finally reduced to mere ‘narratives’ has always loomed menacingly upon the horizon. And although the Party of Truth has often striven valiantly against the Party of Feelz, the threat of a purely subjective and emotional approach to the world has made significant inroads.
This being so, it’s a truly extraordinary sight to see those who actually invented ‘post-truth’ and ‘alternative facts’ consistently railing against these very same things. The supposedly impossible election of President Donald J. Trump in November 2016 left the liberal media and the anxious elites scrambling for a way to discredit the legitimately elected President of the United States of America.
In such a context, where the noonday sun of populist truth is menaced by the midnight gloom of aristocratic falsehood, and the dusk of integrity grimly heralds forth the dawn of MSM lies, it’s comforting to remember how we’ve been here before.
Many, many times.
E-BOOK Can Be Purchased
Peter Boykin is a right-wing activist and the founder of a group called Gays for Trump, he also hosts a regular online radio show, #MagaFirstNews on MagaOneRadio.net Boykin is a prolific social media user, In 2018, Boykin ran for a seat in the North Carolina House of Representatives. Peter Boykin has been featured in multiple left and right-wing media outlets and is never afraid to debate for what he feels is just.
Peter Boykin is also an activist for the #LGBTExit / #LGBTQuit movement. The movement is to encourage Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual people to “exit” the Democratic party and follow Trump. “It’s time we #TakeBackPride and #ComeOutForAmerica it’s time for the LGBT to EXIT #LGBTexit…#LGBTQ #GayPride no longer needs to be associated with Extremism.” – Peter Boykin
The White House wants the U.S. government to have a much bigger say in what you see on social media.
The move presumably has something to do with Trump’s view that social media companies show a systemic bias against conservatives. According to the summary, the Trump administration has received 15,000 complaints on social media companies censoring political conversation on their platforms.
Those complaints likely came from the website the White House created earlier this year specifically asking for consumers to complain about partisan bias by social media companies.
As the law stands now, social media companies are not liable for the content posted by their users under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. They also receive immunity for taking down questionable content, as long as that takedown appears to be “in good faith.” While that provision exists so internet companies aren’t the target of constant lawsuits, the executive order would remove that immunity if a user isn’t notified of the content being taken down, or if the takedown is deemed anticompetitive.
A new draft executive order from the White House would put the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in charge of deciding what sites like Twitter and Facebook can remove from their sites, reports CNN, which obtained a copy of a summary of the order.
President Donald Trump and other conservative leaders have long said that conservative content is censored on major social media networks This order, called “Protecting Americans from Online Censorship,” appears aimed at making it so that conservative content could equally thrive on those sites, regardless of whether it breaks “the rules.”
Conservativish Infowars’ Alex Jones have claimed that they’re censored for being conservative after being kicked off of major social media sites.
The proposed order calls for the FCC to create new regulations on how and when the law will protect social media websites, specifically when those sites decide to remove or suppress content on their platforms. The summary also suggests that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) should take those newly created regulations into account when it files lawsuits against companies or opens investigations into their practices.
Presuming the executive order gets filed, the FTC will also get in on the action. It will have to open a “public complaint docket,” and it will have to work with the FCC on a report on how social media companies curate content on their platforms and whether that curation is done in a neutral way.
The summary suggests that any company whose user base accounts for at least 1/8 of the U.S. population would be subject to scrutiny. That means in addition to Twitter and Facebook, companies such as Google, Pinterest, and Snapchat might also be subject to investigation. ]
What do you think? Is this a Good Idea?
July 6, 2019 – 12pm Freedom Plaza
On July 6th, 2019, we will have a rally at Freedom Plaza, Washington, DC. Confirmed speakers include well-known public figures who have been silenced by Big Tech. Click here to see a list of the speakers. There will be a VIP Event afterwards.
DC #DemandFreeSpeech Rally
Calls To Action
Please sign this petition: demandfreespeech.org/petition – if you want free speech for all.
Attend and promote the #DemandFreeSpeech Freedom Rally July … See More 6.
RSVP on Facebook – share with friends
Freedom Q & A *VIP* Lounge Event
Support and pioneer new entrepreneurial efforts to have hosting companies and social media companies and payment processors that support free speech.
Flock Inc. App
Support these lawsuits against these #BigTech #SocialistMedia “#PrivateCompanies”
Our rights guaranteed under the United States Constitution are being systematically violated. Join the rally to demand unbiased social media, and an end to censorship. Confirmed speakers include well-known public figures who have been silenced by Big Tech.
Please see event website for rally details and a complete list of all confirmed speakers. http://demandfreespeech.org/?
- 1984 Censorship
- CENSORSHIP SUCKS
- Gays Can Be Conservatives
- Gays For Trump
- Gays Go Right
- SOCIAL MEDIA BIAS
Peter Boykin Founder of Gays For Trump Disabled by Facebook Days before his Political Election So first Twitter Disabled @BoykinForHouse Campaign account, then the 2nd one @BoykinForHouse_ , and a chunk of Peter Boykin’s other business accounts. Leaving only his verified account @PeterBoykin Now today, Peter Boykin went to login and his Facebook account only […]
Jack’s Twitter Claims the Right is NOT being #ShadowBanned … Do you Believe That? by Peter Boykin @PeterBoykin How can Twitter claim to have First Amendment rights, while also hiding behind Section 230 of our legal codes? Section 230 says this “no provider or user of interactive computer service shall be treated as the […]
Tired of being Shadow banned and censored by social media? Are YOU NEXT? Just Google Search it: https://www.google.com/search?q=list+of+conservatives+banned+from+twitter This is why we need your help! Help Peter Boykin find and pay for legal defense against social media! http://gofundme.com/stopsocialmediabias The Twitter Account @BoykinForHouse is Still suspended by Twitter. BoykinForHouse.com Who needs Russian Collusion when you have Twitter […]